top of page
Document with Pen

A LITTLE THOUGHT 



Having a little thought is always better than having no thought at all.

James Graham’s crime drama about a crossbow killing rocking an ex-mining town is the TV equivalent of bowling a strike. Everything you could hope for is here



The husband and I have just watched the BBC drama Sherwood – and let me say up top, one of its greatest – drama series, Sherwood, opens with footage of the 1980s miners’ strike. Arthur Scargill shouting, Margaret Thatcher speechifying (that pained and painful voice hurling you back into the past), police dragging people from the picket line, children screaming “scab” at those crossing it. To anyone over the age of 45 or so, it feels like yesterday.



Which is very much the point. Sherwood’s six episodes (airing on Monday and Tuesday nights for three weeks) centre on two shocking murders that took place in real life in 2004, near where writer James Graham grew up, in the Nottinghamshire mining district of Ashfield. Out of these terrible events, Graham, as perhaps only a native – albeit one blessed with his talent – could, conjures a portrait as moving as it is convincing of a place steeped in historic grief and bitterness, full of personal enmities and festering wounds, but bound still by them all.


Alun Armstrong plays Gary Jackson, a National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) stalwart in a village dominated by the Union of Democratic Mineworkers (UDM), who, let’s say, took a softer stance on striking and the privatisation of the coal industry. He is married to Julie (Lesley Manville), who is estranged from her sister Cathy (Claire Rushbrook), although they live next door to each other. When Gary is found dead in the street, killed by a crossbow bolt, the most immediate person of interest to the investigating officer – local boy made good (“Now I live on the outskirts of the village”) Ian St Clair (David Morrissey) – is “scab” Dean (Sean Gilder), with whom Gary had often and recently argued. But he also discovers that Gary’s arrest records from 1984 are inexplicably redacted, even though the charges were dropped thanks to the intervention of Kevin Salisbury (Robert Glenister), one of the Metropolitan police officers sent from London to help local forces control the strikers.

Salisbury’s superiors send him up again from the capital to assist-without-assisting. There’s also a connection to the local drug-dealing family, the Sparrows, whose son we have seen intimidating Gary. St Clair does not know that Cathy’s stepson, who is about to go to prison, is into archery because his dad (Kevin Doyle) didn’t tell them and Cathy doesn’t dare.


Over the way are the Fisher family, due to become more tightly bound to the main narrative next episode. Sarah (Joanne Froggatt) is standing as the local Tory councillor (“‘red wall’ fell, didn’t you hear?”) and is newly wed to Neel (Bally Gill). Her widowed father-in-law Andy (Adeel Akhtar, an absolutely heartbreaking mass of unspoken sorrow and need), is trying to get used to the new domestic order as Sarah remodels the garden and redecorates the house. “What’s an occasional chair?” he says, staring at the item she has proudly unveiled. “It’s a chair you sit on occasionally,” she snaps.


Everything you could hope for is here. It is the drama equivalent of bowling a strike: a writer knowing the setting and themes in his bones, a dream cast drawn to the richly allusive resulting script, each of those actors doing their best work in years (which, given the standards that Manville, Morrissey, Armstrong et al maintain is quite something to watch) and their chemistry, with beautiful direction from Lewis Arnold and Ben A Williams, creating something even greater than the sum of its superb parts. It’s even funny – because it’s about people and because it has made those people real and because real people are, forever, even in their darkest moments, funny. When Salisbury tells St Clair that he has worked on 293 murders, to impress him with his credentials, Nottingham’s finest replies: “Well, London sounds fucking lovely.”


Without sacrificing story or suspense, and never paying less than meticulous attention to teasing out the knotty mass of relationships and the ramifications playing out around the village, Sherwood builds slowly – layer by subtle, evocative layer – into a magisterial state-of-the-nation piece. Forty years of emotion and history have been transmuted, lovingly and painstakingly, into art. It’s the cleverest, most compelling and most moving thing I’ve seen in years. It should, and undoubtedly will, win awards for all concerned. But it should also last, enduring in our memories and set down in books about how to write, act and how best to conjure up a specific world and make it universal, how to show us what we are and how we got here. It is, simply put, wonderful.


Craig plays an American expat living indolently in Mexico City in this sometimes uproarious adaptation of William Burroughs’ autobiographical novel


Daniel Craig in "Queer"


Queer is a story of lost love and last love and mad-about-the-boy obsession, featuring an excellent performance from Daniel Craig


It’s adapted by screenwriter Justin Kuritzkes from the autobiographical novel by William Burroughs, directed by Luca Guadagnino and wonderfully shot by cinematographer Sayombhu Mukdeeprom with digitally rendered landscapes and streetscapes that bring the boozy, bleary reality into alignment with the many (disquieting) dream sequences.


Craig is Lee, an expatriate American based on Burroughs himself – the resemblance is made more overt in a Kubrickian sequence giving him a succession of hallucinatory flashforwards into old age. Lee lives cheaply and indolently in Mexico City after the second world war, hanging around bars, drinking, doing drugs and picking up guys – he is queer, and the word here (in a movie set in the 50s, from a book published in the 80s) might complicate still further the issue of when the word shed its derogatory overtones. Lee conceives a passionate obsession with Gene (Drew Starkey), a handsome American who appears to be straight but attracted to Lee.



Together they go on a weird holiday to South America, because Lee wants to try the fabled hallucinogen yage, or ayahuasca, because he’s heard it gives the user telepathic powers and – poignantly enough – he wants to discover what Gene really thinks and feels about him. It’s a bizarre and uproarious journey into the jungle whose comedy briefly annuls the pain of what he suspects is unrequited love and brings the two into contact with a fierce, reclusive, gun-totin’, snake-wranglin’ scientist and yage expert – a show-stopping cameo for Lesley Manville. There are luxury-cinephile walk-ons for directors David Lowery and Lisandro Alonso.


Craig always commands the screen in his regulation honorary consul crumpled white suit, hat, glasses and a pistol that he bizarrely carries around openly holstered, a droll phallic symbol for this erotic cowboy who is very much a lover not a fighter.


Guadagnino shows that this is an eroticism of the streets: Lee spends so much of his time walking from bar to bar, or – with a guy – from a bar to a hotel. (There’s a great sequence when Lee walks to the accompaniment of Nirvana’s Come As You Are and that track never sounded more purely sensual.)


Lesley Manville in Queer. Photograph: Yannis Drakoulidis


He hangs out with other guys in the same situation as him, chiefly the witty, dyspeptic Frank (Jason Schwartzman), but Lee is special: he seems more like an artist, although whatever artistry this is, it appears, like Wilde’s genius, to be put into his life, or his bed. Craig’s Lee is always sure of himself, somehow even when he’s utterly distraught: when a doctor sternly tells him to give up drugs, Lee sheepishly says that, yes, he really should, but this is only so that this doctor will prescribe some emergency opiates in the meanwhile – he has no intention of actually modifying his own behaviour.


It is a really funny, open, generous performance – perhaps the only disadvantage is that he upstages Starkey, just a little, and his mesmeric screen presence will draw our attention back to Lee, away from Gene and his ambiguous intentions and emotions. Craig is so dominant that sometimes it seems that Gene is almost not worthy of him. Craig is strangely magnificent.

bottom of page